Compare

Numi vs tl;dv: Sales Coaching vs. Meeting Recorder

tl;dv excels at async video highlights: clips, timestamps, and team sharing for any kind of meeting. Numi goes deeper on structured call scoring, AI sales coaching, and DACH language support for B2B sales teams.

Request early access →

Free during private beta. No credit card.

Numi vs tl;dv at a glance

Comparison overview, updated June 2026
Capability Numi tl;dv
Built for DACH B2B sales teams: structured call scoring, AI coaching, German transcription ⚠️All meeting types across any team; popular with product and CS, not built around sales scorecards
Call transcription Self-hosted Whisper, evaluated on German sales calls ⚠️Cloud transcription, broad language support, not German-first
Sales call scoring Citation-grounded scorecards: every score links back to a specific transcript moment No structured scoring; async video clips and AI meeting summaries only
German language German-first: transcription, scoring, and coaching quality evaluated in German ⚠️German supported among many languages, not the primary quality target
Data residency EU only: self-hosted servers in Frankfurt, Germany ⚠️EU company (Cologne); cloud infrastructure; data center location depends on plan
GDPR posture EU hosting, published DPA and subprocessor list ⚠️GDPR-conscious positioning; DPA and subprocessor transparency vary by plan
Pricing ⚠️Free during private beta; paid plans coming post-launch Free tier available; Pro at $18/user/mo, Business at $29/user/mo (billed annually)
Request early access →

Free during private beta. No credit card.

Pricing comparison

Numi

Free
during private beta
No credit card required. Paid plans announced post-launch.

tl;dv

$0
Free tier (5 recorded meetings per month)
$18
Pro, per user/mo, billed annually
$29
Business, per user/mo, billed annually

tl;dv pricing sourced from tldv.io/pricing, June 2026. Prices in USD.

Who should choose Numi

  • B2B sales teams in Germany, Austria, or Switzerland who need German-first transcription and structured call scoring with transcript evidence, not just a video clip or AI summary.
  • Sales managers who want to coach reps on specific moments in a call: citation-grounded feedback they can point to in the transcript, not async video sharing.
  • Teams operating under GDPR who need a fully EU-hosted stack with a published DPA and subprocessor list before they can sign a vendor contract.

Who should choose tl;dv

  • Product, customer success, or sales teams that primarily need async video highlights: timestamped clips they can share internally without watching a full recording.
  • Teams that want a lightweight meeting recorder across any meeting type, with a generous free tier and no sales-specific scorecard requirements.

What users say

Request early access →

Free during private beta. No credit card.